mrshl flaw - Latest Comments

Re: mrshl

Aaron Collins — Sun, 03 Apr 2016 19:54:59 -0000

Go Trump! Give us the Democratic congress that we need.

Re: mrshl.net • With Spoon releasing a new record Tuesday for the...

mrshl — Sat, 02 Aug 2014 10:24:15 -0000

I think that's generally applicable to the band. Merge Spoon is really different from pre-Merge Spoon. Lots of people who love Spoon don't even know Pre-Merge Spoon exists.

Re: mrshl.net • With Spoon releasing a new record Tuesday for the...

Meg — Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:07:03 -0000

It's like we like different bands, and they happen to both be called Spoon.

Re: mrshl.net • With Spoon releasing a new record Tuesday for the...

Meg — Fri, 01 Aug 2014 23:04:14 -0000

WHAT? The transition between first and second songs on "Series of Sneaks" obviously.

Re: mrshl.net

ABP LIVE Application — Thu, 10 Jul 2014 02:24:37 -0000

Sachin attended wimbeldan

Re: life is a thrill • Honda creates the perfect bike for navigating the...

Signal Watch — Wed, 26 Mar 2014 13:54:58 -0000

I thought it looked a bit like Kaneda's bike in Akira. We're finally getting our post-Apocalyptic accouterments!

Re: mrshl.net

mrshl — Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:43:50 -0000

That would be an awful lot of work. Maybe one day Spotify will be as good as Rdio, and I'll switch. OR you could join me on the Rdio.

Re: mrshl.net

annielin — Tue, 05 Mar 2013 13:45:23 -0000

can you make this spotify compatible too?

Re: mrshl.net • See the Real Models for the Archer Characters —...

Dug Schulz — Sat, 09 Feb 2013 21:27:09 -0000

holy crap, i know that doctor

Re: Late addition to my Albums of 2012 list. Sorry, I... | mrshl.net

mrshl — Tue, 08 Jan 2013 09:21:40 -0000

Overgrown Path by Chris Cohen

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/30438318073

mrshl — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:06:19 -0000

That is awesome. And very close to my work. Also DUG WHY HAVE WE NOT HUNG OUT?

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/30438318073

Dug Schulz — Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:00:38 -0000

Pinballz arcade is not a bar, but it is BYOB and an ARCADE!

http://www.pinballzarcade.com/

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/29140246422

Tom Kirkendall — Sat, 11 Aug 2012 17:20:30 -0000

Actually, Scola has been in decline for the past two seasons, and the decline steepened dramatically last season. Given that decline and his expensive contract, Scola had no meaningful trade value. Using the amnesty option on him was the right decision.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/29140246422

mrshl — Sat, 11 Aug 2012 15:38:40 -0000

I think Simmons's best critique is that Morey let Scola go for nothing. But that article does explain why Orlando passed up our deal for the head-scratching trade they accepted. Orlando's so dumb.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/29140246422

Tom Kirkendall — Sat, 11 Aug 2012 08:48:20 -0000

Simmons is way off base here. Morey made the moves necessary to make the best offer for Howard. However, you can never remove the risk of a GM doing something stupid, which is what Hennigan did in approving the Howard trade. Morey offered a far better deal than what Hennigan got. Can't blame him for that. Good explanation here:
http://www.red94.net/happen...

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/28426357753

mrshl — Tue, 07 Aug 2012 09:35:34 -0000

Agreed. That's what it's looking like.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/28426357753

jsenske — Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:12:50 -0000

Entertaining, yes. But does not matter. Dude is going to lose--- badly.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/28129456172

jsenske — Mon, 30 Jul 2012 22:36:31 -0000

Well done, sir!

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/27865872299

mrshl — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:22:24 -0000

Roads are actually what Obama referred to when he said "that."

And yeah, since you have several trucks, and your entire business is based on reaching other businesses via roads, I'd imagine you view our public road system as a significant and appropriate government expenditure. If you don't have to think about roads that much, that's a government success. Lots of other countries can't take their infrastructure for granted.

While I'm guessing most of your clients are private, I'd be surprised if you didn't contract with a few important government clients.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/27675569696

mrshl — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 09:12:26 -0000

Now that I read this, it sounds more like I'm criticizing conceal carry laws. I'm not, I was just trying to point out that states were going in the wrong direction with respect to their gun laws: i.e., making guns more pervasive instead of less so.

I do know that the content of Conceal Carry courses is very much geared to safety and sensibility (I have read articles! I can read!). Also, I've not seen data on the subject, but I'm inclined to agree that concealed carry permit owners are unlikely to be mass shooters.
Also, if we view conceal carry permits and required safety courses as positives, it is actually an argument in favor of gun regulation, not against it (why wouldn't such permitting work for other guns?).

Finally, mass shootings are no longer super rare events. They happen quite frequently (we average 20 a year). One of the Aurora victims had been at the site of another such shooting just a month earlier. And while we can't prevent them, we can probably make them less lethal by making it harder to obtain automatic rifles that can shoot hundreds of rounds in short succession. I agree with many of the points in this post: http://swampland.time.com/2...

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/27959303405

mrshl — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:59:27 -0000

My point here, is that the idea that guns don't kill people is false. And, as you point out, "lots of guns" is much more dangerous than "fewer guns."

I agree it's too late to sharply limit the presence of guns in our country. I also agree with folks who buy guns to protect themselves in their own homes. I'm also fine generally with a concealed carry permitting regime.

I just think the NRA's zero tolerance for any sort of gun regulation is idiotic and has very real repercussions. And that the slogans and rhetoric they've promoted over the years, especially the "people kill people" mantra has been either false or exaggerated.
To me, it's kind of puzzling that so many people want the gun discussion to be binary: that is either we have total gun freedom or no guns at all. Those are both extreme positions. And it's unlikely either would be the optimal level of regulation.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/27675569696

jsenske — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:28:28 -0000

While truly terrible, these "mass shootings" are the work of an infitissimal fraction of a percent of the population. We need not legislate based on the unfortunate actions of the very rare and very random individual psycho. Fact is, even with your purported easing of regulations, the overwhelming vast majority of gun owners and concealed carry holders especially never fire a single shot at another human being. Even in "threatening" situations the overwhelming majority never draws their weapon.
I'm guessing you're pretty clueless as to what's actually taught in a concealed carry course. The dominant message is "you do not want to ever use your gun". You're taught it's far better in practically every situation to not shoot someone. You don't hear about concealed carry people randomly shooting some shady character who approaches them asking for spare change at

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/27865872299

jsenske — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:19:13 -0000

I can assure you I/my company has not benefitted. Unless youre going to give me the old "but we drive on the roads" bit.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/27959303405

jsenske — Thu, 26 Jul 2012 01:10:31 -0000

What's your point? Most people have a gun to simply protect themselves should the situation arise. I don't want only the bad guys and idiots to have the guns. Its too late for your idealism. Guns are everywhere-- including with the bad guys.

Re: http://mrshl.net/post/27045908387

mrshl — Thu, 12 Jul 2012 13:03:17 -0000

Whew.